Monday, June 06, 2011

Turn Out The Lights...

From the Desk of Marc Adam Smith:

[Editor's Note: As many of you may know, we at Point of You had a home away from home with our Officers Gerard Savoy and Tina Trimble - we hosted many a party and held many a rehearsal there. At the end of 2010, they left the city for the suburbs. What better way to end our 10th Anniversary Season than with a look back...]

"The Parties Over" the recently passed Don Meredith used to sing that at the end of Monday Night Football in the 70's and 80's and now it seems apropos for the end of the CASA DE SAVOY where so many of us spent so much time over the past few years. I hope you all had a chance to stop by and help out with the move, and to take one more look at our home away from home and the two folks who invited us into it over the years, I can only think back to 8 years ago when we started going there...

Tina and G had 5 Cats: DJ, Jack, Roscoe, Ben and Omar. They now have one cat...do the math folks.

Mel and Sean where a couple living together down in the South Street Seaport and had no cats or a baby... and Mel was not yet Jewish, welcome to the front of the Bus Mel!

Jeff and Meghan where not Jeff and Meghan.... Jeff was ....well Jeff, and Meghan as far as we knew did not exist. Since we can only think of them as a couple let us not dwell on the past.

Paul looked like Lenny from the Simpsons, and back then he was always leaving things at the loft. Glad that stopped....wait, I think G just found Paul's South End script.

Johnny was the Dirty one, the single guy who had the nerve to sleep with women. OMG how did we ever survive that shock? And now he's a married man!

Keating was Keyser Soze in training, and now we know how wrong we where about him (PLEASE DO NOT KILL ME ONE DAY KEATING)

And I was a Loudmouth, Sarcastic, Prick... Good that some things stay the same, huh?

------

Editor's comments: Thank you for the love, the laughter, the learning and the food. We'll miss the loft. Thank you G & T for letting us share that magical place with you.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, March 01, 2010

A 10th Anniversary Conversation with our Founders

Jeff: I feel like Jeremy Pevin talking to John Cusack in Gross Point Blank, “TEN YEARS!!! TEN YEARS! TEN….YEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRSSSSSSSS!.....TEN! YEARS!”

Johnny: Oh, I see where you’re going. I thought it was because I’ve lived in Chicago. Yes, Point of You has been around for 10 years. Wait, WHAT?!?!?

Jeff: It’s amazing when you’re so focused on the next project how suddenly you take a break and look behind you and see you’re a decade older and such is the case with Point Of You Productions.

Johnny: Stop saying that! You’re making me feel old! I still buy comic books, for crying out loud! … Maybe I shouldn’t have confessed that to the World Wide Web?

Jeff: Do you think there’s anybody out there who’s shocked by that?

Johnny: (sigh) No. BUT comic books play a pivotal role in our 2011 season!

Jeff: Stop looking ahead right now. This blog is about looking behind us.

Johnny: … I like these curtains.

Jeff: (sigh) And as amazing, wonderful, and even surprising as it is to see that POY has turned a tenth of a century older this year, I can’t say that if you had told us ten years ago that we’d still be doing theater that I would’ve expected anything else.

Johnny: That’s quite a run-on sentence you’ve got there. But I take your point.

Jeff: I mean, some of the faces have changed but the goal hasn’t.

Johnny: I was updating some of our files the other day and it’s amazing to see how much the Ensemble and even the governing board has changed over the years. So many fantastic guest artists have worked on our stages and some truly amazing people have dedicated years to this group and continue to do so.

Jeff: A special thank you to Melanie Kuchinski Rodriguez, Chris Keating, Paul Weissman and Karron Karr who have been with us since Day One. And to all of the current Ensemble members and guest artists who help us continue to do entertaining, challenging, and well crafted shows.

Johnny: I know you said no looking forward but we’ve got to talk about our 2010 season at the very least.

Jeff: This will be a different year for us as we will be bringing back some old favorite productions with new casts (mostly) and directors (possibly…depending on if enough people want to see me act).

Johnny: Oooh! Should we put that to a vote?

Jeff: How many sugars were in your coffee this morning?

Johnny: I can’t blink, so… seven? -teen?

Jeff: Moving on. We kicked off our 10th season with a night of stand-up and improv comedy that was a HUGE success. Thank you to Gotham City Improv for the use of the space! And coming up in March we’re bringing back a fan favorite.

Johnny: If you say Hurt So Good I think I’ll cry. That show takes a lot out of me!

Jeff: No no, we're bringing back our staged adaptation of Kenneth Branagh’s A Midwinter’s Tale. It opens on WEDNESDAY!!

Johnny: I love that movie!

Jeff: Who doesn’t? A bunch of desperate actors fed up with their current career paths trying to do Hamlet to save a church, Christmas and their souls?

Johnny: Sounds a bit like how POY started. Only we did Titus Andronicus and it had nothing to do with Christmas.

Jeff: Although that gives me an idea!

Johnny: Save it for 2012! This time around, A Midwinter’s Tale has some of the same performers from the 2004 production but all of them are playing different roles. In addition to the newer ensemble members we also have some fantastic guest artists. This production is already a hoot and a holler!

Jeff: And that’ll take us through winter. Come summer, we’ll have an I’m Just Saying with a “summer in the city” theme, looking at life in NYC dealing with the heat, enjoying the sun, hating the humidity, etc.

Johnny: But with flashbacks to various years! It’s not just about summer 2010.

Jeff: Correct. And again, we’ll have plenty of guest artists bringing new scenes, monologues, songs, you name it.

Johnny: And I promise the theatre will be air conditioned!

Jeff: And this fall we’ll be doing a brand new production of Christopher Marlowe’s Dr. Faustus.

Johnny: Marlowe’s written something new? Amazing (if not highly improbable)!

Jeff: What I mean is we’ve done Shakespeare before but this will be our first adventure with Marlowe. This, by the way, will have a Washington D.C. angle with Dr. F being a prominent Governor, or Senator, or whatever politician is in the news that month for being a scoundrel…it came to me while in the bathroom of a bar. Not so surprising when you think about politics and the devil these days…

Johnny: It just hit me! Ten years, man. A decade!

Jeff: I know! And as challenging as every year has been in the way of finding spaces for shows, and ways to draw in crowds with much smaller wallets than in previous years, what seems to never be hard to do is to find something challenging to ask people. In the case of A Midwinter’s Tale, we ask why people put themselves through such hell to do something they love, why they chase so hard after something. In a sense, we’re asking is theatre worth it, or life? And why?

Johnny: But in a funny way!

Jeff: And with Dr. Faustus, we will be asking our audiences at what point do we, as voters, decide that personal demons should be allowed to usurp our decisions of who we want running our country, city, or state (I mean seriously! He brought a prostitute across state lines. THAT’s a reason to get rid of the man an entire state wanted as Governor…? Really?????)

Johnny: Ok, reign in the rant, there, killer. Save it for the stage.

Jeff: Hopefully the next ten years will yield similar successes of exciting productions and amazing performances, but if we had a goal that we most would like to see realized, it would be to finally find a home for POY where we can do all of our shows. After all, as we get older, we do feel that ache to finally settle down.

Johnny: Ya think? In the past ten years, we’ve had four weddings and one baby (with another one due in April).

Jeff: Johnny means the company settled down! (Dude, this is how Ernie and Bert rumors get started!)

Johnny: I look back with nothing but pride. We’ve built one hell of a family here at Point of You. I look forward to giving each and every one of them a chance to shine.

Jeff: Anything else sappy you’d like to say in conclusion?

Johnny: A toast! All my love to long ago and to days to come!

Labels: , ,

Friday, January 29, 2010

Stand Up vs. Theatre - it's a whole new ball game

From the desk of Jeff Love:

So I'm five hours away from making my sophomore performance as a stand up comic. Somebody asked me the other day if it was any different than doing theater. I'm hard pressed to think of anything MORE different from doing theater. I mean sure, there are certain characteristics that are the same. In both you're "performing" in front of an audience, timing and words and sometimes props are involved...but comedy is far less forgiving than theater. In theater, an audience, even if they are going to see a comedy, is open to anything. Stand up audiences, on the other hand, expect to laugh...period. It doesn't necessarily matter why, or when, or how...but if you tell a joke, do a bit, or tell a story during a stand up set and there isn't a laugh, you've failed. Period.

The thing that makes stand up both thrilling and absolutely petrifying is that you only have yourself to rely on. Even if you do an act that relies on exact wording, chances are you're still doing material you've written, and again, if no one laughs, they know exactly who to blame.

Even my act, that doesn't have a typical setup-punchline delivery and is about a guy on stage who's petrified, won't be funny if the wording and timing is off. And it's a very funny thing about comedy, not everyone has the same opinion as to what's good comedy, but truly bad comedy is something that most people agree on. I've been to clubs where nothing but strangers from all walks of life sit there and watch some poor schmuck get up on stage - something they all admit they could never do - and tells something he thinks is a joke, and nothing but crickets.... While sometimes there'll be comedians who say something that some people don't respond to, but others will.

It's that definite freeze of time...when a joke doesn't land...that is the performance equivalent to getting the wrong chamber in a game of Russian Roulette.

Hopefully tonight I won't be reminded of that silence before my five minutes are up.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Part Two: The Reading (of the Celeb Rehab show)

For those who read my first installment “The Inception” this is part two of that “series”. POY recently read the first draft of my comedy set in a celebrity rehab center and had, as one would hope, a great amount of help to offer. I thought however, that I would begin this blog entry with my thoughts and feelings pre-reading…because…well…it seems sort of interesting to do it that way. Maybe give folks a better perspective of what it’s like for a writer as opposed to the reader/listener of a play’s first draft:

The night before the reading:

It’s a little bit like feeling the need to clean up before company comes over. For me, no matter how much time I’ve spent cleaning, there’s always SOME piece of “wrongness” I can take five minutes and fix. A bit of dusting, for example, seems suddenly deadly important when people are just about to arrive. Sure, they probably won’t actually check the top of your doorways but hey…you never know. And if they do, how cool will it be when they look down on their index finger and don’t actually see any dust.

That, to me, is what I strive for in a first reading. Blithe Spirit by Noel Coward was written in four days, Zoo Story by Edward Albee in very few as well (I think a week…maybe two?) And all without any real revisions (so I’ve been lead to believe in any case). That, along with the legend that Shakespeare never had drafts (which I personally think is a lie) makes me dream of everyone sitting remarkably silent after the last line is uttered from this draft…shook to their very core at the genius they’ve just been witness to. I imagine they’ll tell their children, and their children’s children about how they were there when the Pulitzer Prize winning play by Jeff Love was first read out loud and how it made everyone in the room lose their breath with admiration and awe.

Of course, when that is what I am hoping for, and I look down at what they’ll actually be reading by my hand, I see the need to dust as much as is humanly possible in what appears to be an impossibly small amount of time (and even though my parallel discusses the time period as being mere minutes, in reality, I’ve had months to write this play…)

It’s not that I can’t take criticism…I love criticism…I remember realizing in 8th grade that as soon as I was proven wrong about something, I could go the rest of my life speaking the opposite of what I’d previously believed with complete and utter conviction for I knew (now) that I was “right”.

So, I love people tearing apart my work. It makes it stronger, tighter, more professional and well…better…basically. And who wouldn’t always want to get better? But really…if given a choice between “getting better”…and simply “being the best”…who wouldn’t rather be...the best? I know I would. And so I’m dusting. Dusting the heck out of what might as well be the desert in the state my wife is from. There’s simply no way around it. This play is going to suck.

My self consciousness can’t help but to leap to all sorts of excuses…it literally becomes an excuse-making machine. “well I was getting married…,” “I really haven’t felt well…some sort of stomach bug or something…,” “how can I concentrate on a play when there’s so much death in the world?” and of course, the ever popular, “dude, I totally wrote this last night while I was drunk off red bull and wine coolers…” but I have to ignore the need for those excuses and opt, instead, for maturity because…well…my friends and family would think less of me if I didn’t.

Nope…time to step up to the plate, take my knocks, and a few other cliché metaphors that never really help when you’ve put you’re heart on the line and fully expect it to be stomped.

After the Read:

Maybe it’s a defense mechanism that I always expect the worst but hope for the best. But I am once again astounded by the fact that the company of readers didn’t throw me out on my ass saying that this was the worst piece of rubbish they’ve ever read in their lives. With the exception of a few jokes (replacing the “n” word for the word “noodle” for the character going through language rehab for example, seemed to be on everyone’s list of best bit) I pretty much thought I should be thoroughly ashamed of myself. After all, while we were reading my play, I realized how absolutely absent of character, plot, and setting the entire thing seemed to be (not that any of those things are essential to today’s theatrical productions). It sounded as if written by a fifth grader (did I write this in fifth grade and just, understandably, forget…?) it sounded as if written by a fifth grader who was arrogant enough to think he had something worth listening to…the gall!

But there was a lot of laughing (always a good thing when writing a comedy) and everyone immediately responded with the customary, “I liked it”. It’s at times like that when being a director comes in handy. You listen closely to the subtext involved in the simple, polite sentence, “I liked it.” And see if you can detect elements of sarcasm, sincerity, or, possibly, flat out lying.

In the end…mostly what I was left with was that there was too much “bantering” between the characters I’ve assigned to me and Johnny, and not enough of the supporting characters. And while I’d love to dismiss these remarks as simply those of needy actors wanting more lines and more interesting moments to act on stage (it was sort of amusing seeing folks flipping through the pages to come to see when their next line would be)…the fact of the matter is…they’re right. When I wrote before about letting the characters act out different basic scenarios revolving around a simple theme such as “who ate my roll?” I should’ve noticed that most, actually ALL…of those scenes involved my two favorite characters…the ones I’m writing for me and Johnny. Now of course, comes the arduous task of finding the voices and moments in the other characters that will help me fall AS in love with them as, I hope, the audience will.

This comes down to the same thing…start writing different scenarios involving them. See what “sticks” and is fun and/or interesting for the audience to listen to. After all, plays should be the most interesting conversations anyone’s overheard, at least for me.

Back to the drawing board…let’s see what happens.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

The Inception (of the Celeb Rehab show):

From the desk of Jeff Love, Artistic Director:

This will be the first part of a series. I'm not entirely sure how many parts there will be in this series because I've never mapped this sort of thing out before. Essentially, what I plan on doing here is showing the steps that I, and occasionally other members of Point of You Productions, take when deciding to write a show for the company to perform.

THE INSPIRATION

At some point, while watching the news, it dawned on me that our society is completely entranced in hearing about various celebrities going to rehab, whether they are famous for acting, singing, or pretending to do those things, we are, as a collective consciousness, spending time thinking about them. This is usually a good indication that POY has a subject to write about.

What also seems to be a fixation is just how much these rehab centers are actual rehab centers versus how much they're glorified country clubs that cater to the wealthy and mentally irresponsible. This dichotomy, along with the need for a subject, seems to immediately indicate a genre best suited for the subject. For me, this genre is clearly comedy.

So there we have it. A comedy, about celebrity rehab.

THE OUTLINE

After already bouncing the ideas off the other company members and some select friends and family, everyone seems very positive (as opposed to my idea of a tragedy musical about dolphins dying in fishing nets) and so all that remains is...well...absolutely everything else.

First an outline (which I've been taught goes in 3 stages: the play's story written in a paragraph, than a page, then several pages describing what happens, with each draft obviously becoming more and more in-depth regarding the events). After that, you make sure all the characters you
need are fully thought out in your head. Are there any who are too similar and should be combined, or one who should be eliminated? This gets particularly tricky when you are trying to write parts for your friends and company members because along with wanting to put on a good show, POY makes it a point to encourage each company member to be challenged and have fun (so, for example, writing a part for Johnny to be a crazy old man in a wheelchair as I did for Five Years Later, while never getting any older or less funny in my mind, wouldn't necessarily be the best for him as a stepping stone to becoming a fully rounded actor).

THE DIALOGUE

Once the characters are fully fleshed out, and I have people in mind (or a couple of people) for the parts, I begin writing bits of dialogue about any general conflict ("who ate my roll!?" or what have you) to get a feel for how the characters talk and interact with one another. This is usually such a fun part of the process, that it completely supersedes everything else, and I've got piles of "bits of dialogue" that may very well never see the light of day...but it was still fun coming up with the lines.

THE CHARACTER AND CONFLICT

Then I begin to see if any bits of dialogue can be directly inputted into the play. I've already mapped out the scenes and the conflicts, so hopefully something as simple as "who ate my roll?" in a celebrity rehab comedy could become, "who vomited on my stash?" (because I hear that can happen in those places). If not, then the process of truly "working" comes in as you try to capture the characters, tone, and conflicts that your play needs. This is often where writers can misstep, because we tend to either love dialogue we've written but it doesn't fit the conflict, or it fits the conflict but seems to be completely out of left field for the characters to say. When either happens, it's important not to be too married to either characters or conflict. And I usually
rely on company members and other writers to tell me if this happens since they'll be the initial audience who decides if everything makes sense (until opening night that is).

You have to back up and see what it is you're trying to accomplish with a scene, character, or play as a whole, and then change whatever needs to be changed in order to communicate the Moral of the story. I had a pair of "judges" for Five Years Later that took me until a month
before rehearsals started to finally admit they should not be kept.

But once you've done that, you've got a working draft, and then the fun part of rewriting after readings happens... I’ll write about that next!

Labels: , , ,